3,688
edits
Caudal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29028948/ Volumes of the spinal canal and caudal space in children zero to three years of age assessed by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for volume dosage of caudal blockade] | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29028948/ Volumes of the spinal canal and caudal space in children zero to three years of age assessed by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for volume dosage of caudal blockade] | ||
Kim HJ, Kim H, Lee S, Koh WU, Park SS, Ro Y. Reconsidering injection volume for caudal epidural block in young pediatric patients: a dynamic flow tracking experimental study. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2024;49(5):355-360. (In eng). DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104409. | |||
2. Ahmed Z, Mai C, Skinner KG, Yaster M. At the birth of pediatric anesthesia in Mexico: An interview with Dr. Estela Melman, a pioneering woman in medicine. Paediatric anaesthesia 2018;28(12):1066-1070. (In eng). DOI: 10.1111/pan.13518. | |||
3. Hannallah RS, Broadman LM, Belman AB, Abramowitz MD, Epstein BS. Comparison of caudal and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for control of post-orchiopexy pain in pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology 1987;66(6):832-834. | |||
4. Polaner DM, Taenzer AH, Walker BJ, et al. Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN): a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesthesia and analgesia 2012;115(6):1353-64. (In eng). DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31825d9f4b. | |||
5. Adler AC, Belon CA, Guffey DM, Minard CG, Patel NV, Chandrakantan A. Real-Time Ultrasound Improves Accuracy of Caudal Block in Children. Anesthesia and analgesia 2020;130(4):1002-1007. (In eng). DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004067. | |||
6. Jain D, Hussain SY, Ayub A. Comparative evaluation of landmark technique and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection in pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatric anaesthesia 2022;32(1):35-42. (In eng). DOI: 10.1111/pan.14332. | |||
7. Boretsky KR, Camelo C, Waisel DB, et al. Confirmation of success rate of landmark-based caudal blockade in children using ultrasound: A prospective analysis. Paediatric anaesthesia 2020;30(6):671-675. (In eng). DOI: 10.1111/pan.13865. | |||
8. Ponde V, Shah D, Nagdev T, Balasubramanian H, Boretsky K. Ultrasound determination of the dural sac to sacrococcygeal membrane distance in premature neonates. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2022;47(5):327-329. (In eng). DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103344. | |||
9. Brenner L, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: the effect of different volumes of local anaesthetics. British journal of anaesthesia 2011;107(2):229-35. (In eng). DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer128. | |||
10. Sinha C, Kumar A, Sharma S, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: Effect of different volumes of local anesthetic. Saudi journal of anaesthesia 2017;11(4):449-453. (In eng). DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_284_17. | |||