Measuring Outcome in Pediatric Anesthesia
This is a Stub Notice. This page has not been completed. You can work on this page by signing in and going to the Edit tab. Thanks for helping to make PedsAnesthesia.Net Wiki useful.
Go to the Main Page to see the Topic Outline.
Go to the Generalized Suggested Outline for information on case-specific details for each page.
Go to the Test Page for examples on how to use references in the page.
Relevant Article Depot:
Searching for the Holy Grail: measuring risk in paediatric anaesthesia
Pediatric anesthesia - potential risks and their assessment: part I
Pediatric anesthesia--potential risks and their assessment: part II
Biostatistics for Biomedical Research
Setting a Universal Standard: Should We Benchmark Quality Outcomes for Pediatric Anesthesia Care?
How to perform and write a meta-analysis
Lean methodology in quality improvement
The Anesthesia Incident Reporting System (AIRS) AIRS Case Entry
Introduction to Bayesian Analyses for Clinical Research
Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language
Risk Stratification to Predict Perioperative Mortality in Children
The central limit theorem: The remarkable theory that explains all of of statistics
Implementation science: a primer
Implementation Science in Perioperative Care
Behavioural disorders after prenatal exposure to anaesthesia for maternal surgery
Systematic review A systematic review summarizes the findings of primary research studies that address a specific research question. It uses explicit and reproducible methods to search, appraise, and synthesize the evidence. Systematic reviews are often used to inform clinical guidelines and policy.
Meta-analysis A meta-analysis is a statistical process that combines the results from multiple studies to estimate the overall effect of a variable or intervention. Meta-analyses are often an outcome of a systematic review.
Scoping review A scoping review is a preliminary assessment of the available research literature on a topic. It aims to identify the nature and extent of the research evidence, including ongoing research. Scoping reviews are less rigorous than systematic reviews and are not usually used to inform policy and practice.