Electrocautery: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:13, 12 December 2024

This is a Stub Notice. This page has not been completed. You can work on this page by signing in and going to the Edit tab. Thanks for helping to make PedsAnesthesia.Net Wiki useful.

Go to the Main Page to see the Topic Outline.

Go to the Generalized Suggested Outline for information on case-specific details for each page.

Go to the Test Page for examples on how to use references in the page.

Relevant Article Depot:

Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature

Case report: full-thickness forehead burn over indwelling titanium hardware resulting from an aberrant intraoperative electrocautery circuit

https://twitter.com/rbarbosa91/status/1636962863318454272?s=46&t=X_9iaGrsYZbY5PJKh6nAPQ

Revision as of 17:54, 27 July 2023 view source WikiSysop (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 3,747 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 14:13, 12 December 2024 view source WikiSysop (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 3,747 edits No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/2789491/jamasurgery_blumenstein_2022_it_220001_1652211220.85345.pdf Bringing to Light the Risk of Burns From Retained Metal Jewelry Piercings During Electrosurgery—Torching the Myth]		[https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/2789491/jamasurgery_blumenstein_2022_it_220001_1652211220.85345.pdf Bringing to Light the Risk of Burns From Retained Metal Jewelry Piercings During Electrosurgery—Torching the Myth]

			[https://x.com/rbarbosa91/status/1866784221106409887?s=46&t=X_9iaGrsYZbY5PJKh6nAPQ Twitter thread]