Measuring Outcome in Pediatric Anesthesia: Difference between revisions

From PedsAnesthesiaNet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 44: Line 44:


[https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16420 The central limit theorem: The remarkable theory that explains all of of statistics]
[https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16420 The central limit theorem: The remarkable theory that explains all of of statistics]
[https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/fulltext/2023/12000/implementation_science__a_primer.1.aspx Implementation science: a primer]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29425593/ Implementation Science in Perioperative Care]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39107163/ Development and validation of a score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications in infants and children (SPORC-C)]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38423824/  Behavioural disorders after prenatal exposure to anaesthesia for maternal surgery]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38423824/  Behavioural and neuropsychological outcomes in children exposed in utero to maternal labour epidural analgesia]
<b>Systematic review</b>
A systematic review summarizes the findings of primary research studies that address a specific research question. It uses explicit and reproducible methods to search, appraise, and synthesize the evidence.
Systematic reviews are often used to inform clinical guidelines and policy.
<b>Meta-analysis</b>
A meta-analysis is a statistical process that combines the results from multiple studies to estimate the overall effect of a variable or intervention. Meta-analyses are often an outcome of a systematic review.
<b>Scoping review</b>
A scoping review is a preliminary assessment of the available research literature on a topic. It aims to identify the nature and extent of the research evidence, including ongoing research. Scoping reviews are less rigorous than systematic reviews and are not usually used to inform policy and practice.

Latest revision as of 14:45, 20 October 2024

This is a Stub Notice. This page has not been completed. You can work on this page by signing in and going to the Edit tab. Thanks for helping to make PedsAnesthesia.Net Wiki useful.

Go to the Main Page to see the Topic Outline.

Go to the Generalized Suggested Outline for information on case-specific details for each page.

Go to the Test Page for examples on how to use references in the page.


Relevant Article Depot:


Searching for the Holy Grail: measuring risk in paediatric anaesthesia

Pediatric anesthesia - potential risks and their assessment: part I

Pediatric anesthesia--potential risks and their assessment: part II

An Evaluation of Severe Anesthetic-Related Critical Incidents and Risks From the South African Paediatric Surgical Outcomes Study: A 14-Day Prospective, Observational Cohort Study of Pediatric Surgical Patients

Biostatistics for Biomedical Research

Setting a Universal Standard: Should We Benchmark Quality Outcomes for Pediatric Anesthesia Care?

How to perform and write a meta-analysis

Perioperative Mortality in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Risk Assessment Tools for Use in the Preoperative Setting

Lean methodology in quality improvement

Perioperative Mortality in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Risk Assessment Tools for Use in the Preoperative Setting

The Anesthesia Incident Reporting System (AIRS) AIRS Case Entry

Introduction to Bayesian Analyses for Clinical Research

Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language

Beyond Anesthesia Toxicity: Anesthetic Considerations to Lessen the Risk of Neonatal Neurological Injury

Perioperative Anesthesia-Related Complications and Risk Factors in Children: A Cross-Sectional Observation Study in Rwanda

Debunking Developmental Delay: Assessing Associations between Anesthesia in Infancy and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Risk Stratification to Predict Perioperative Mortality in Children

Development and implementation of local pediatric anesthesia performance metrics at a Canadian children’s hospital: a technical report

Long-term outcomes of early exposure to repeated general anaesthesia in children with cystic fibrosis (CF-GAIN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled phase 4 trial

Short-term outcomes in infants following general anesthesia with low-dose sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil versus standard dose sevoflurane (The TREX trial)

The central limit theorem: The remarkable theory that explains all of of statistics

Implementation science: a primer

Implementation Science in Perioperative Care

Development and validation of a score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications in infants and children (SPORC-C)

Behavioural disorders after prenatal exposure to anaesthesia for maternal surgery

Behavioural and neuropsychological outcomes in children exposed in utero to maternal labour epidural analgesia

Systematic review A systematic review summarizes the findings of primary research studies that address a specific research question. It uses explicit and reproducible methods to search, appraise, and synthesize the evidence. Systematic reviews are often used to inform clinical guidelines and policy.

Meta-analysis A meta-analysis is a statistical process that combines the results from multiple studies to estimate the overall effect of a variable or intervention. Meta-analyses are often an outcome of a systematic review.

Scoping review A scoping review is a preliminary assessment of the available research literature on a topic. It aims to identify the nature and extent of the research evidence, including ongoing research. Scoping reviews are less rigorous than systematic reviews and are not usually used to inform policy and practice.