Measuring Outcome in Pediatric Anesthesia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[https://www.apsf.org/article/the-anesthesia-incident-reporting-system-airs/ The Anesthesia Incident Reporting System (AIRS)] | [https://www.apsf.org/article/the-anesthesia-incident-reporting-system-airs/ The Anesthesia Incident Reporting System (AIRS)] | ||
[https://qualityportal.aqihq.org/AIRSMain/AIRSCaseEntry AIRS Case Entry] | [https://qualityportal.aqihq.org/AIRSMain/AIRSCaseEntry AIRS Case Entry] | ||
[https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/fulltext/2024/03000/introduction_to_bayesian_analyses_for_clinical.9.aspx Introduction to Bayesian Analyses for Clinical Research] | |||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36728715/ Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language] | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36728715/ Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language] | ||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31517675/ Beyond Anesthesia Toxicity: Anesthetic Considerations to Lessen the Risk of Neonatal Neurological Injury] | |||
[https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/fulltext/2024/05000/perioperative_anesthesia_related_complications_and.19.aspx Perioperative Anesthesia-Related Complications and Risk Factors in Children: A Cross-Sectional Observation Study in Rwanda] | |||
[https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/139/4/A16/138848/Debunking-Developmental-Delay-Assessing Debunking Developmental Delay: Assessing Associations between Anesthesia in Infancy and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes] | |||
[https://pubs.asahq.org/monitor/article/88/5/22/140071/Risk-Stratification-to-Predict-Perioperative Risk Stratification to Predict Perioperative Mortality in Children] | |||
[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12630-024-02763-9 Development and implementation of local pediatric anesthesia performance metrics at a Canadian children’s hospital: a technical report] | |||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38851197/ Long-term outcomes of early exposure to repeated general anaesthesia in children with cystic fibrosis (CF-GAIN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled phase 4 trial] | |||
[https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/doi/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005232/141990/Short-term-outcomes-in-infants-following-general Short-term outcomes in infants following general anesthesia with low-dose sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil versus standard dose sevoflurane (The TREX trial)] | |||
[https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16420 The central limit theorem: The remarkable theory that explains all of of statistics] | |||
[https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/fulltext/2023/12000/implementation_science__a_primer.1.aspx Implementation science: a primer] | |||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29425593/ Implementation Science in Perioperative Care] | |||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39107163/ Development and validation of a score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications in infants and children (SPORC-C)] | |||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38423824/ Behavioural disorders after prenatal exposure to anaesthesia for maternal surgery] | |||
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38423824/ Behavioural and neuropsychological outcomes in children exposed in utero to maternal labour epidural analgesia] | |||
<b>Systematic review</b> | |||
A systematic review summarizes the findings of primary research studies that address a specific research question. It uses explicit and reproducible methods to search, appraise, and synthesize the evidence. | |||
Systematic reviews are often used to inform clinical guidelines and policy. | |||
<b>Meta-analysis</b> | |||
A meta-analysis is a statistical process that combines the results from multiple studies to estimate the overall effect of a variable or intervention. Meta-analyses are often an outcome of a systematic review. | |||
<b>Scoping review</b> | |||
A scoping review is a preliminary assessment of the available research literature on a topic. It aims to identify the nature and extent of the research evidence, including ongoing research. Scoping reviews are less rigorous than systematic reviews and are not usually used to inform policy and practice. |
Latest revision as of 14:45, 20 October 2024
This is a Stub Notice. This page has not been completed. You can work on this page by signing in and going to the Edit tab. Thanks for helping to make PedsAnesthesia.Net Wiki useful.
Go to the Main Page to see the Topic Outline.
Go to the Generalized Suggested Outline for information on case-specific details for each page.
Go to the Test Page for examples on how to use references in the page.
Relevant Article Depot:
Searching for the Holy Grail: measuring risk in paediatric anaesthesia
Pediatric anesthesia - potential risks and their assessment: part I
Pediatric anesthesia--potential risks and their assessment: part II
Biostatistics for Biomedical Research
Setting a Universal Standard: Should We Benchmark Quality Outcomes for Pediatric Anesthesia Care?
How to perform and write a meta-analysis
Lean methodology in quality improvement
The Anesthesia Incident Reporting System (AIRS) AIRS Case Entry
Introduction to Bayesian Analyses for Clinical Research
Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language
Risk Stratification to Predict Perioperative Mortality in Children
The central limit theorem: The remarkable theory that explains all of of statistics
Implementation science: a primer
Implementation Science in Perioperative Care
Behavioural disorders after prenatal exposure to anaesthesia for maternal surgery
Systematic review A systematic review summarizes the findings of primary research studies that address a specific research question. It uses explicit and reproducible methods to search, appraise, and synthesize the evidence. Systematic reviews are often used to inform clinical guidelines and policy.
Meta-analysis A meta-analysis is a statistical process that combines the results from multiple studies to estimate the overall effect of a variable or intervention. Meta-analyses are often an outcome of a systematic review.
Scoping review A scoping review is a preliminary assessment of the available research literature on a topic. It aims to identify the nature and extent of the research evidence, including ongoing research. Scoping reviews are less rigorous than systematic reviews and are not usually used to inform policy and practice.