Urodynamic Studies: Difference between revisions

From PedsAnesthesiaNet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Stub Notice}}")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Stub Notice}}
{{Stub Notice}}
[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apa.16733 Medical clowns versus sedation for paediatric urinary catheter insertion—A randomised pilot study]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23061785/ Comparison of low-dose ketamine to midazolam for sedation during pediatric urodynamic study]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8813929/ The effects of intranasal midazolam on urodynamic studies in children]
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18771162/ Creating a sedation service for pediatric urodynamics: our experience]

Latest revision as of 13:52, 1 February 2024

This is a Stub Notice. This page has not been completed. You can work on this page by signing in and going to the Edit tab. Thanks for helping to make PedsAnesthesia.Net Wiki useful.

Go to the Main Page to see the Topic Outline.

Go to the Generalized Suggested Outline for information on case-specific details for each page.

Go to the Test Page for examples on how to use references in the page.


Relevant Article Depot:


Medical clowns versus sedation for paediatric urinary catheter insertion—A randomised pilot study

Comparison of low-dose ketamine to midazolam for sedation during pediatric urodynamic study

The effects of intranasal midazolam on urodynamic studies in children

Creating a sedation service for pediatric urodynamics: our experience